1
0
mirror of https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt.git synced 2025-11-11 19:08:26 -06:00

refactor: use the term unmount instead of dismount (#1478)

* refactor: use UNMOUNT instead of DISMOUNT in code

This change updates the term DISMOUNT in constants to UNMOUNT.
Other occurrences (e.g. variable names) are left alone for now.

* refactor(ui): use unmount instead of dismount

This change updates the GUI text and replaces dismount with unmount.

* docs: update term dismount -> unmount

* refactor(cmdline): add unmount

This change adds an argument 'unmount' for command line usage, while
trying to deprecate the old disnount argument.
The current dismount argument/flag will still work to not introduce
a breaking change.

* docs: mention that /dismount is deprecated

This change fixes the shorthand version of the argument /unmount
It also adds back the info for /dismount and that it is deprecated.
This commit is contained in:
Helmut K. C. Tessarek
2025-01-31 23:18:26 +01:00
committed by GitHub
parent c71fa14dc0
commit 498dff9013
99 changed files with 2014 additions and 2006 deletions

View File

@@ -47,8 +47,8 @@
<li>Windows is prevented from automatically creating the &lsquo;<em>Recycled</em>&rsquo; and/or the &lsquo;<em>System Volume Information</em>&rsquo; folders on VeraCrypt volumes (in Windows, these folders are used by the Recycle Bin and System Restore features).
</li><li>Windows 8 and later is prevented from writing an Event 98 to the Events Log that contains the device name (\\device\VeraCryptVolumeXX) of VeraCrypt volumes formatted using NTFS. This event log &quot;feature&quot; was introduced in Windows 8 as part of newly introduced
NTFS health checks as <a href="https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/b8/2012/05/09/redesigning-chkdsk-and-the-new-ntfs-health-model/" target="_blank">
explained here</a>. Big thanks to Liran Elharar for discovering this. </li><li>Windows may use caching methods and write delays that are normally used for removable media (for example, USB flash drives). This might slightly decrease the performance but at the same increase the likelihood that it will be possible to dismount the volume
quickly without having to force the dismount. </li><li>The operating system may tend to keep the number of handles it opens to such a volume to a minimum. Hence, volumes mounted as removable media might require fewer forced dismounts than other volumes.
explained here</a>. Big thanks to Liran Elharar for discovering this. </li><li>Windows may use caching methods and write delays that are normally used for removable media (for example, USB flash drives). This might slightly decrease the performance but at the same increase the likelihood that it will be possible to unmount the volume
quickly without having to force the unmount. </li><li>The operating system may tend to keep the number of handles it opens to such a volume to a minimum. Hence, volumes mounted as removable media might require fewer forced unmounts than other volumes.
</li><li>Under Windows Vista and earlier, the &lsquo;<em>Computer</em>&rsquo; (or &lsquo;<em>My Computer</em>&rsquo;) list does not show the amount of free space on volumes mounted as removable (note that this is a Windows limitation, not a bug in VeraCrypt).
</li><li>Under desktop editions of Windows Vista or later, sectors of a volume mounted as removable medium may be accessible to all users (including users without administrator privileges; see section
<a href="Multi-User%20Environment.html">