From 26cba020910f16b4e1bac181831f195089e0f5f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bill Zissimopoulos Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:47:10 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] doc: minor fix in performance testing document --- doc/WinFsp-Performance-Testing.asciidoc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/WinFsp-Performance-Testing.asciidoc b/doc/WinFsp-Performance-Testing.asciidoc index 4d31eb8f..3e36aa4e 100644 --- a/doc/WinFsp-Performance-Testing.asciidoc +++ b/doc/WinFsp-Performance-Testing.asciidoc @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ This test measures the performance of cached ReadFile with 1 page reads. The res ifdef::env-browser[chart::line[data-uri="WinFsp-Performance-Testing/rdwr_cc_read_page_test.csv",file="WinFsp-Performance-Testing/rdwr_cc_read_page_test.png",opt="x-label=iterations,y-label=time"]] ifndef::env-browser[image::WinFsp-Performance-Testing/rdwr_cc_read_page_test.png[]] -==== rdwr_nc_write_test +==== rdwr_nc_write_page_test This test measures the performance of non-cached WriteFile with 1 page writes. WinFsp has the best performance, followed by Dokany. NTFS shows bad performance, which of course make sense as we are asking it to write all data to the disk.